Connect with us

Banking

BoG Clarifies GHS60.8bn Loss

Published

on

The Governor of the Bank of Ghana (BoG), Dr Ernest Addison, has clarified that the GHS60.8 billion loss reported by the bank was not money lost through its operations in 2022.

He explained that it was a technical loss resulting from the haircut and the application of accounting standards to estimate expected credit losses on government debt held by the bank.

He added that anytime the economy faces major challenges, the bank’s balance sheet suffers, and the equity position moves into negative territories.
The governor assured that the bank’s current financial condition will not impact negatively on the operations of the bank.

The International Monetary Fund’s technical assistance mission validated this conclusion. The bank will manage to reduce its operational costs during this period.

In a statement, the central bank head said “It is not money lost by the Bank of Ghana through its operations in 2022.”

He pointed out that one should look at this as a reflection of the total cost of the economic and social crisis the country faced over the years and an attempt to resolve a major structural problem of the Ghanaian economy.

“I must also add that, if one takes time to go through historical financial statements of the Bank of Ghana, you will realize that this is not the first time that the Bank has gone into negative equity.

“During the early years of structural adjustment, very large exchange rate depreciations led to revaluation losses that drove the Bank into negative Equity,” he said in a statement issued on Monday, August 21.

He further explained that anytime the economy faces major challenges, the Bank of Ghana’s balance sheet suffers, and the equity position moves into negative territories.

“You will recall that in 2017 and 2018, the Bank of Ghana incurred similar negative equity from the impairment of legacy liquidity support loans granted in 2015 and 2016 to insolvent banks, which our external auditors impaired due to the doubtful prospects of recovering from those insolvent banks. The Bank of Ghana however, recovered and generated profits throughout the period 2019 to 2021.

“It is worth noting that Central Banks are not commercial banks. Bank of Ghana’s current financial condition will not impact negatively on the operations of the Bank. The IMF technical assistance mission validated this conclusion before the necessary decisions were taken.

“In their opinion, the Bank of Ghana was policy solvent and would remain so, as it had enough income to cover monetary policy operational costs. The Bank of Ghana had sufficient capital amounting to about 15 per cent of its total liabilities. Its recommendation was for the Bank to retain all profits and a reassessment should be made in the year 2027. The Bank will also manage to reduce its operational costs during this period,” he explained.

Giving further details on what caused the loss, the BoG statement in providing answers to frequently asked questions on the losses on Tuesday, August 1, “As we all know, the Government of Ghana embarked on both domestic and external debt restructuring. The holdings of Government instruments and COCOBOD exposures were all part of the perimeter of the debt exchange. Whereas all other stakeholders that participated in the Domestic Debt Exchange (DDEP) did not have principal haircuts, but rather had new instruments with new tenors and coupon structure, the BoG, which served as the loss absorber to the entire debt exchange programme, a key requirement that allowed the Government of Ghana to meet the threshold for the approval of the IMF programme.

“As a result, the BoG had to take on a 50 percent principal haircut on the total principal (which stood at GHC 64.5 billion at the time of the exchange).”

It added “Consequently, BoG had new instruments with extended tenor and significantly reduced coupon. By applying the full requirements of IFRS 9, this means that from the principal alone, a 50 percent haircut on the non-marketables amounted to a loss of GHC32.3 billion.

“The impairment from exposure to COCOBOD also amounted to GHC4.7 billion. These three DDEP items (ie marketable, non-marketable and COCOBOD) accounted for GHC53.1 billion out of the total loss of GHC 60.8 billion for 2022. In addition to these three items, price and exchange rate valuation effects accounted for GHC5.2 billion of the total loss, whereas interest expense on cost of monetary policy operation accounted for GHC3.3 billion.”

Due to the impairment of the Government of Ghana’s securities holdings of ¢48.45 billion, impairment of loans and advances granted to quasi-government and financial institutions amounting to GH¢6.12 billion and the depreciation of the local currency resulting in net exchange loss of GH¢5.27 billion, the Bank of Ghana recorded GHS60.6billion loss in 2022.

The loss was occasioned by the Government of Ghana Domestic Debt Exchange Programme.

According to the BoG, its Board of Directors and Management assessed the policy solvency implications arising out of the negative net worth position and the group’s ability to continue to generate enough income to cover its monetary policy operations and other operational costs.

In the view of the directors, the Central Bank will continue to operate on a going concern basis due to a variety of factors underpinned by expectations of an improved macroeconomic situation and policy actions specifically targeted at improving its balance sheet.

Banking

Cross border interoperability: Governor calls for effective collaboration between regulators, financial institutions, others

Published

on

The Governor of the Bank of Ghana, has called for effective collaboration between regulators, financial institutions, mobile money operators, FinTech innovators, and other stakeholders in Africa, saying, it is crucial to address technical challenges, ensure regulatory compliance, build trust, and drive the scalability and sustainability of cross-border mobile money and other interoperability initiatives.

According to him, by fostering a collaborative ecosystem, Africa can harness its FinTech advancements to unleash the full potential of interoperable mobile money systems, benefiting both individuals and countries across the continent.

Giving remarks at the Africa Prosperity Network 2024 Symposium on Retail Payment Interoperability, he said the need for a robust framework that enables seamless cross-border payment in Africa has remained central to most recent policy, development, and financial inclusion discussions.

This, he added underscores the enormous constraint faced on the continent and the quest for concrete actions to promote cross-border payment systems to achieve our shared aspirations

“We are living in a time where most African’s first interaction with the financial sector may be through their smartphones. We are also living in a time where Africa’s cross-border payments are costly, where sending $100 could end up being only $40 received in some of the most expensive corridors. You would agree with me that these two scenarios present an optimal opportunity for scaling up cross-border transactions on the continent. The good news however is that our financial future is filled with possibilities, and at the forefront of these advancements lies the interoperability of our payment systems”, the Governor continued.

He stressed that the concept of interoperable mobile money systems holds enormous potential for the establishment of comprehensive cross-border payment interoperability in the short-medium term.

As such, an efficient cross-border payment interoperability system can deliver seamless payments between buyers and sellers across African countries, as well as provide extensive inclusivity in expanding access to payment and financial services for the youth, vulnerable groups, and striving entrepreneurs.

‘This notwithstanding, achieving cross-border interoperable mobile money systems would require harmonised regulatory frameworks, consistent technical standards, and robust infrastructure. In addition, strong public-private partnerships, involving mobile network operators, financial institutions, FinTechs, and regulators would address technical challenges and ensure regulatory compliance”, the Governor intimated.

Other strategies that would ensure the adoption and long-term system reliability of cross-border payment interoperability, he said, include customer education and trust, scalability, and system sustainability, as well as inclusive access, which is essential for all segments of society, including rural and underserved populations.

He concluded on a positive note, saying, the foundational elements necessary to implement this idea of cross-border payment interoperability are partly in place in some African countries. These include regulatory sandbox programmes, progressive regulatory frameworks, and a dynamic FinTech sector, eager for growth opportunities. However, what may be lacking is collaboration among stakeholders

Continue Reading

Banking

Bank of Ghana clarifies role of FinTechs in remittance space

Published

on

The Bank of Ghana has clarified the role of FinTechs in the remittance space.

In an explainer on the remittance framework shared on the Bank’s social media handle, the Bank emphasized that the local FinTech companies authorised by the central bank do not mobilize FX from abroad.

Rather, it is the Money Transfer Organization based abroad that receive remittances from abroad.

The mobilized funds are then paid into the nostro account of the local partner banks with the FinTechs involved in the downstream payment to beneficiaries.

However, recent comments by some market watchers had wrongly blamed FinTechs for withholding FX abroad.

This erroneous impression is corrected by the BOG in the explainer. The confusion seems to stem from the mixing up of the role of MTOs and FinTechs. Watch the explainer.

Continue Reading

Banking

IEA advocates for extended term for BoG Governor to ensure continuity

Published

on

In a bold move aimed at bolstering Ghana’s economic stability, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) is making a strong case for crucial amendments to the Bank of Ghana Act 2016.

Central to their proposal is the extension of the Governor’s tenure, ensuring continuity and independence from presidential terms.

Speaking at a Stakeholders’ Forum themed “Reviewing the Bank of Ghana’s Act to Promote Transparency, Accountability, and Effectiveness,” Senior Scholar Prof. Alexander Bilson Darku from the IEA emphasised the critical importance of safeguarding the Central Bank from governmental influence over the Governor’s terms and conditions.

He asserted that maintaining this autonomy is essential for upholding the effectiveness and independence of the regulatory institution.

“We began by examining the composition of the Bank of Ghana’s board, the governor’s appointment process, and the regulatory framework governing government lending limits,” he said.

“There was a consensus on the necessity for Ghana to carefully consider aligning the term of the Bank of Ghana Governor to overlap that the of President to ensure continuity and effectiveness in governance,” he added

Prof. Alexander Bilson Darku further explained that: “substantial discussion focused on enhancing the independence of the Bank of Ghana and its ability to effectively promote price stability, exchange rate stability, and economic development through sound policy measures”.

Continue Reading

Trending